Public details: How many people really, really want to see an 85 year old movie in black and white and likely not very great sound? Well, generally, not me, either.
But that said, this is a movie at The Hipp, which is non-profit and had funding unaccountably yanked, along with funding for every cultural/art effort in the State, so I'm a more than a bit willing to shell out $25 to watch a classic movie at The Hipp. (and get a free drink too) As long as I think it might be kind of interesting. Annnd... it might well be.
You can read what The Hipp has to say about the flick with the location link, above. But, also, this:
"Sullivan's Travels received disparate critical reception upon its release. The New York Times described it as "the most brilliant picture yet this year", praising Sturges's mix of escapist fun with underlying significance, and ranked it as one of the ten best films of 1941. But The Hollywood Reporter said that it lacked the "down to earth quality and sincerity which made [Sturges's] other three pictures of 1941 – The Great McGinty, The Lady Eve, and Christmas in July – "a joy to behold".
Over time, the film's reputation has improved tremendously. Media historian Hal Erickson classified it as a "classic", "one of the finest movies about movies ever made" and a "masterpiece".[3] In 1990, Sullivan's Travels was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant."
An IMDB reviewer said this in part:
"Sturges' most daringly double-edged film, laced with bitter ironies. It is also arguably the most audacious film in Hollywood's (mainstream) history, audacious because it takes the kinds of risks that can so easily fall flat on their face, and right until the final image, as Sturges becomes increasingly ambitious and multi-layered, you wonder how long he can keep it up without getting ridiculous. It never does, but the film is so full of contradictions, tensions, suppressions..." |